Thursday, November 20, 2008

No Bond for Charlie Grapski


The court denied Charlie bond based on the nature of his pending offenses and on arguments made by the Assistant State Attorney Geoffrey Fleck that Charlie would be a danger to the community. Grapski's court appointed attorney, John Stokes successfully withdrew from the case based on a conflict of interests. Stokes was the third court-appointed lawyer to withdraw from Grapski's defense.


Orange & Blue Hold Off Gator
-developing story on the 5hr Showdown.
(never been happier to have been dead-wrong!!!)

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

You guys forgot about Naadira already. JJ doesn't have a chance against this girl. Miorelli and co. would be well served before they get RAN THE F*** OVER.

Anonymous said...

Are they playing football?

Anonymous said...

Bud Calderwood lays it down like it ought be laid down. You want to look up a real Alachua activist look no further that Bud Calderwood.

Anonymous said...

Thanks, I think?

Anonymous said...

Bud Calderwood is a thug! Who are you "NUBAGUY?" Bud was never in NUBA, people like him had no place there.

Anonymous said...

I think you are right about my not fitting in at the ALA. I went to one of their meetings and Robert Perez threatened me with physical harm. I have it on video.

Anonymous said...

How about some real SG stuff? What about Weingard being elected FBK president? What about the Miorelli JJ showdown?

Anonymous said...

So you are going to do Joe Goldberg interview, but not a Moseley, JCB, Miorelli, Naadira, Simmons or...anyone else of any recent relevance.

Until this blog starts catering to the Joe Trimboli crowd, and not the Ken Kerns crowd, it will continue to be neglected on the 3rd floor of the Reitz Union.

Anonymous said...

Who the fuck is Joe Tromboli!

Anonymous said...

The reason Duque hasn't done a Moseley interview is because Moseley won't speak to him. Poor thing.

Christian Duque said...

Not true 9:52.

Anonymous said...

So if you were to e-mail Moseley and ask him for an interview (again), he would agree?