"Any problems we have with Glenda are trumped by the
problems we have with Stan. Stan is a shady SOB. However, he will bend over backwards to help any student org so he does some good. Do you have any stories about Stan? I would love for there to be a complete audit of SG finance.
Also, we dont really have any problems with Sandy. Though we have only dealt with her around the campaign season as she has been on medical leave for several months."
More to come folks, but before I continue with Glenda-Gate, Renfroe-Watch, Impeach Drayton, or other fun features up my sleeve, I'm dying to read the Kerns/Capezza Clarification(s) on the notion that the GDI's scrutiny of Glenda would "derail" the movement. I'm curious, as others also seem to be, why two such highly respected GDI's would issue such ambiguous warnings, sans actually refuting the allegations or offering a rebuttal. "Stop or else" is not jargon taught at GDI 101 - anywhere..